Episode 8

full
Published on:

25th Mar 2025

Injunctions, Mootness, and the Legal Tricks That Shut Down Civil Liberties Lawsuits

Can you really “win” a lawsuit if the court never rules on your case? In this episode of Unwritten Law, Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione break down two recent developments that make it even harder to hold the government accountable in court.

First, they tackle the Supreme Court’s decision in Lackey v. Stinnie, which denied attorney’s fees to plaintiffs who clearly forced a change in state policy—simply because the government mooted the case before final judgment. Then, they unpack President Trump’s new executive order instructing agencies to demand financial bonds from plaintiffs seeking injunctions—adding serious risk to suing the federal government, even in civil liberties cases.

Listen for free

Show artwork for Unwritten Law

About the Podcast

Unwritten Law
NCLA Podcast About Administrative Law
Unwritten Law is a podcast hosted by Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione, brought to you by the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA). This show dives deep into the world of unlawful administrative power, exposing how bureaucrats operate outside the bounds of written law through informal guidance, regulatory “dark matter,” and unconstitutional agency overreach.

About your host

Profile picture for New Civil Liberties Alliance

New Civil Liberties Alliance

For over a century, unlawful administrative power has gradually displaced the Constitution’s avenues for lawmaking and justice. Although we still enjoy the shell of our Republic, there has developed within it a very different sort of government—a type, in fact, that the Constitution was designed to prevent. The unconstitutional Administrative State is the focus of NCLA’s concern.